How many websites under a VPS server of 5 core CPU, 10 gb RAM?

[simplysexyboy]

Very Nice, following is showing our loader test results. We have capped it with less than 10%CPU, I believe it was a 4core 8GB instance. No cache, no tweaks, pure raw performance. 10,000 users per minute equal 24 hrs 14.4 Million per day. All on AWS but not with T2s.

I don’t think this is possible
Don’t offend
But
rather requesting empty page
Or
Cached with ram optimized server server serving good amount of resource.

 

[ckeeper]

I don’t think this is possible
Don’t offend
But
rather requesting empty page
Or
Cached with ram optimized server server serving good amount of resource.

I will be happy to share the latest results when we are done with our testing. We have used tengine for those tests, it was HTML page, I believe we have also hit 7K requests per minute with wordpress installation, again without cache etc. I know it is hard to believe but we have our own stack with our custom code and programming behind it.

 

[simplysexyboy]

I will be happy to share the latest results when we are done with our testing. We have used tengine for those tests, it was HTML page, I believe we have also hit 7K requests per minute with wordpress installation, again without cache etc. I know it is hard to believe but we have our own stack with our custom code and programming behind it.

As you said this is a HTML page.
maybe 10kb....
Empty.
How you can equal PHP with the HTML zero byte

Finish your testing and put your URL here then we see what it is but until then don't spread wrong information........

Do testing with Woocommerce one product store min 10MB picture 110HTTP request............

 

[ckeeper]

Like I have said, 10K per minute we have used HTML file as proof of concept, nevertheless it was not an empty file. Make sure to check out the sent and recieved bandwith part in loader test results before accusing me spreading rumors. I have also said we have reached around 7-8K requests per minute with wordpress without using cache, we have used the Onum Demo6 (not an empty wordpress site as you claim) Following are our test results. I am not spreading any rumors, simply sharing our current results. Whether you can do this or not is your problem not mine. I will not be sharing all of our setup details just to satisfy your curiosity. I am also willing to see your test results reaching 10K reqs per minute even with HTML file.

Clients	Response Time (ms)	Response Count	Bandwidth
Avg	Min	Max	200	400/500	Timeouts		Network	Error	Sent in MBs	Received in GBs
2400	187	67	4057	140865	0	0	412	0.292	14	17.23
2400	90	67	1770	143834	0	0	0	0	14.97	17.58
2800	618	67	8547	167788	0	0	0	0	17.47	20.5
2800	858	67	11869	167789	0	0	6	0.004	17.46	20.5
2600	116	67	2518	155815	0	0	0	0	16.22	19.04
2700	161	67	4162	161806	0	0	0	0	16.84	19.77
2400	84	68	1525	143718	0	0	104	0.072	14.96	17.56
2400	94	67	1829	141359	0	0	76	0.054	14.72	17.27
2400	98	67	2247	141441	0	0	0	0	14.72	17.28
2400	109	67	3445	143830	0	0	0	0	14.97	17.58
2800	163	67	3104	167764	0	0	0	0	17.47	20.5
3500	299	67	10007	208326	0	2	1240	0.595	21.7	25.46
3200	228	67	6413	191517	0	0	252	0.132	19.94	23.4
3100	205	67	4406	185650	0	0	117	0.063	19.33	22.69
3000	214	67	4649	179608	0	0	10	0.006	18.7	21.95
4200	449	68	10340	244439	0	0	6930	2.835	25.49	29.9
3600	368	67	15797	215151	0	0	45	0.021	22.44	26.3
3600	326	67	10001	215396	0	1	302	0.14	22.44	26.32
3500	303	69	6916	209581	0	0	22	0.01	21.83	25.62
4200	1087	69	16916	250101	0	18	1260	0.504	25.8	30.6
3500	272	67	8026	209683	0	0	46	0.022	21.85	25.62
4000	470	67	11229	233498	0	10	2157	0.924	24.36	28.54
5000	1129	134	7267	257378	0	0	2	0.001	27.14	31.71
5000	1131	203	5440	261398	0	0	0	0	27.52	32.19
5000	1131	266	5810	261524	0	0	0	0	27.5	32.21
8000	1843	145	20557	253096	0	47	2053	0.811	27.26	31.45
8000	1873	403	17976	253475	0	27	2381	0.939	27.33	31.49
8000	1839	398	20001	253077	0	20	2508	0.991	27.31	31.43
7000	1605	427	16973	256667	0	4	420	0.164	27.27	31.75

 

[simplysexyboy]

Like I have said, 10K per minute we have used HTML file as proof of concept, nevertheless it was not an empty file. Make sure to check out the sent and recieved bandwith part in loader test results before accusing me spreading rumors. I have also said we have reached around 7-8K requests per minute with wordpress without using cache, we have used the Onum Demo6 (not an empty wordpress site as you claim) Following are our test results. I am not spreading any rumors, simply sharing our current results. Whether you can do this or not is your problem not mine. I will not be sharing all of our setup details just to satisfy your curiosity. I am also willing to see your test results reaching 10K reqs per minute even with HTML file.

Clients	Response Time (ms)	Response Count	Bandwidth
Avg	Min	Max	200	400/500	Timeouts		Network	Error	Sent in MBs	Received in GBs
2400	187	67	4057	140865	0	0	412	0.292	14	17.23
2400	90	67	1770	143834	0	0	0	0	14.97	17.58
2800	618	67	8547	167788	0	0	0	0	17.47	20.5
2800	858	67	11869	167789	0	0	6	0.004	17.46	20.5
2600	116	67	2518	155815	0	0	0	0	16.22	19.04
2700	161	67	4162	161806	0	0	0	0	16.84	19.77
2400	84	68	1525	143718	0	0	104	0.072	14.96	17.56
2400	94	67	1829	141359	0	0	76	0.054	14.72	17.27
2400	98	67	2247	141441	0	0	0	0	14.72	17.28
2400	109	67	3445	143830	0	0	0	0	14.97	17.58
2800	163	67	3104	167764	0	0	0	0	17.47	20.5
3500	299	67	10007	208326	0	2	1240	0.595	21.7	25.46
3200	228	67	6413	191517	0	0	252	0.132	19.94	23.4
3100	205	67	4406	185650	0	0	117	0.063	19.33	22.69
3000	214	67	4649	179608	0	0	10	0.006	18.7	21.95
4200	449	68	10340	244439	0	0	6930	2.835	25.49	29.9
3600	368	67	15797	215151	0	0	45	0.021	22.44	26.3
3600	326	67	10001	215396	0	1	302	0.14	22.44	26.32
3500	303	69	6916	209581	0	0	22	0.01	21.83	25.62
4200	1087	69	16916	250101	0	18	1260	0.504	25.8	30.6
3500	272	67	8026	209683	0	0	46	0.022	21.85	25.62
4000	470	67	11229	233498	0	10	2157	0.924	24.36	28.54
5000	1129	134	7267	257378	0	0	2	0.001	27.14	31.71
5000	1131	203	5440	261398	0	0	0	0	27.52	32.19
5000	1131	266	5810	261524	0	0	0	0	27.5	32.21
8000	1843	145	20557	253096	0	47	2053	0.811	27.26	31.45
8000	1873	403	17976	253475	0	27	2381	0.939	27.33	31.49
8000	1839	398	20001	253077	0	20	2508	0.991	27.31	31.43
7000	1605	427	16973	256667	0	4	420	0.164	27.27	31.75

Do you even know HTML and PHP differences? Do you even lift bro?
HTML is static files..... the other means is a readable text by people and machine..................... Means is cached you don't even need a caching....... Just optimize the line and no-repeat that will be work out of the case.
I asked you for a URL in PM and you share with me a WordPress with heavily optimized and WP Rocket cache enabled too after that you said this is our testing environment.

Anyway,

Do you want to see my testing HTML file zero byte 10k request in 1 minute? Okay, give me your server stats.
AWS? Hardware Ram Location...
I want it because please don't say your server stats are different...

I'm will show you the difference with my setup.

 

[azurad09]

i absolutely have no idea what you guys are talking about, but it sounds se**. Looking forward to understand your level of language one day.

 

[Hzura]

can i join the discus...
if you have that performance....
i think the result depend on webserver that you use on the sites,
Example if you have 50-100 active visitor, on every sites (total let's says, 50sites)
error's or no is depend to your webserver

for now, there's 3 Main webserver that i know
- Apache
- Nginx
- OLS (OpenLiteSpeed)

For now, if you compare, with simple comparation, you will have the result that Apache can handle less visitor than other's webserver, and also have larger error's result,
second, Nginx can handle more visitor than Apache, but still have some "medium-large" error's result
and last, OLS can handle larger visitor than the 2 previous webserver, and also have smaller error's result

also OLS will have error's result when they used on alot of visitor, like.... 10,000++ at once

so the answer is depend, what type website you wan't to use, how much the image, how the ip throttle, what type webserver you used, etc, but if you want to use multiple website with that setting, maybe apache still working good on you... just need to setting some ip throttle little bit to limit "bad" user's from flooding your sites with spam request.

 

[simplysexyboy]

Alright, guys,

I have been busy, so I couldn't spin up a new VPS to test it.

No CDN, Both Server Location in Oregon West USA
AWS Lightsail 2vCPU 4GIG

• Both home page is 500Words 3 Gif 13.5MB Total Page Size. Theme twenty twenty 1, Cache warm-up 3 times before start Testing
• Installed OS - Ubuntu 20
• Installed Apps is Nginx, MariaDB, PHPFPM74, Fail2Ban, Redis
• Stress Loading Test: loader IO
• No WordPress optimizations
• 3 Plugins: Opcache, Memory Ram, Nginx Helper
• Server-Side Caching ( FastCGI ) + Redis Object Cache = No caching plugin...

1. This is not optimized FastCGI, Redis, Opcache Just Standart Installation with FastCGI Caching, Load Stress Test 1 Virtual User to 10K within 1 minute, all concurrent. No file caching.
The web site is https://getchristmas.deals not optimized:




2.load Stress test 1 Virtual use to 10K within 1 minute all concurrent. ( Same )
The web site is: https://getblackFriday.deals have optimized:
Opcache, Fastcgi, FileHandle, Timeouts+Buffers, Redis ( Not Yet Mysql ), PHP.ini ( Memory others )



Conclusion
Tweaking server and app configuration so important as you can see after optimizations even 1 request not handing by Nginx( webserver), every other request is sending to the FastCGI cache.
This is a natural DDOS protector

As you can see with the free tier, you can have over 100 websites on your VPS.

I pick 4GIG 2vCPU to show you how much need server resources.
The second page does not use any server resource...

I forget to mention that after 2500 concurrent users request one IP address nginx has seen suspects that's why the connection start to time out.

 

[simplysexyboy]

DDoS, this https://getblackFriday.deals web site lets, see if you can break it down?